What is “Bad” Teaching?

Let me start off by saying, I hate this question. I don’t think it solves anything when we consider it. It doesn’t bring us closer to resolutions that help our teachers, our students, or our schools.

It’s more of a divining rod that is used to single out people we don’t think fit in.

It’s fairly simple to say what Newsweek did last year: “we must fire bad teachers” because it provides a villain to root against.

If you’re a parent who can’t understand why your child isn’t succeeding then “Ah! blame the teacher.” If you’re a principal concerned with low test scores and bad attendance, “Must be bad teachers.” If you’re a teacher yourself and you’re fed up with attitudes around you then you really know who the “bad teachers” are.

What does that word “bad” really tell us though? I was pushed a bit deeper into thought yesterday when Teach Hub, an education resource website, posted a quote on their Facebook page:

“Good teachers are costly, but bad teachers cost more.” Bob Talbert

It was a jab I felt not because I see myself as a defender of “bad” teachers, but of language and rhetoric. I think the way we frame our discussions about teaching, education, and success in those areas is directly related to what we will see come to pass.
I don’t usually style myself as an Internet comment combantant clammoring for a fight, but I felt strongly about this idea. Any time I hear a person debase or celebrate teachers, I try to find a way to understand what exactly they are speaking to. The “good” as well as “bad” is deceiving.

Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck writes often about the nature and definition of success as something founded in our minds. If we have a growth mindset, we believe (as the title suggests) that growth in ability is possible. On the contrary, if we have a fixed mindset, we become solidified that peoples’ talents and skills are just innate.

When if comes to talking about education–a subject everyone wants to speak as an expert on–the idea of success is hard to pin to one area. Is it graduation, attendance, state test scores, ACT, SAT, AYP, growth from year-to-year, poverty, marital status of parents, participation in extracurriculars…? The list goes on indefinitely.

When people speak about teaching using only the words “good” or “bad” they are making a jump. What they miss is information vital to understanding the challenges inherent in their school. If you exhibit a fixed mindset about schools, then succeeding is simply a matter of staffing, sorting, and widget manufacturing.

As Dweck and others have written, finding success is not a matter of rating, ranking, and measuring who is already good or bad. In fact, success isn’t something you “find” at all; you have to create it.

I’m sure parents wouldn’t subscribe to the idea that their child is simply smart or dumb and that’s that. If that attitude was allowed and accepted, schools wouldn’t stop at firing the bad teachers, they’d be firing bad students too. So why would we allow for our discussions about teachers and schools to be reduced to the same? Teachers need to grow in the same ways as students. When they grow and learn together, a community begins to form.

Rather than using unhelpful adjectives to modify and amplify our rhetoric about education reform, why don’t we look at the verbs?

It is more helpful for me to say to a student, “I can see in your writing that you defend your position about for-profit colleges with clear and relevant details” than “this is great, what a good essay!” In the same way, it is more honest for me to say ” I can see you are writing a lot of valid topic sentences, but not including any bridge between them” than “this is a bad paragraph, you need to work on this.

Adjectives are deceptive because they help name something but don’t provide any real sense of truth. They are so often subjective rather than objective. “Mrs. Abernathy is a good teacher” says something completely different than “Mrs. Abernathy builds rapport with students quickly and uses that to facilitate learning.”

In one description, we get an opinion, and the other gives a clear picture of action in connection to value. Compounding the two would create something decent, but Strunk and White would probably question your introductory clause, “Mrs. Abernathy is a good teacher because…” it is completely unnecessary. When you say “good” what you are really trying to do is show the good thing; in this case, the good thing is building rapport with students and facilitating learning.

The challenge is, it’s much harder to be deliberate and intentional in our critiques. That’s why the lure of binary good/bad language is so strong.

I dare you to cut the words “good” and “bad” completely from your functional vocabulary (don’t forget their synonyms too). Watch how your language shifts from something vague, emotional, and subjective, to a tool of description that leads to action. Whether you’re a teacher, parent, principal, student, or citizen, it is your duty to have dialogues that mean something real and don’t just label.

7 thoughts on “What is “Bad” Teaching?

  1. I would say that a “bad” teacher is one that does not care enough to come out from behind their desk to interact with the students. A “bad” teacher is the one that nods their head in agreement during staff meetings, professional development opportunities, etc. then goes to their class room, shuts the door and does not try to practice what they have learned. A “bad” teacher does not feel the need to get better. A “bad” teacher grades papers during student work time instead of helping students and/or conferencing with students.

  2. Thank you for the response Kelly!

    I wonder, what would it look like if your comment were rephrased without using the word “bad”? Where would the emphasis be? How would you have to point to those descriptions of teaching in order for them to be relevant? You are writing many things I would certainly agree with, but those critiques hinge on the situation in which we apply them.

  3. Pingback: Tweets that mention What is “Bad” Teaching? « Hi, I’m Steve Moore -- Topsy.com

  4. I’m with you, Steve. ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ are subjective and unnecessary adjectives in this conversation. ‘Effective’ and ‘ineffective’ is better when such distinctions need to be made…and that’s not very often.

  5. Steve,
    I do not allow my 3rd graders to use the words “good” and “bad” in their writing or to describe feelings. They are really meaningless words. I hate the debate about getting rid of bad teachers because who is really deciding what is “good” or “bad”. I agree that there are people in this profession who are not effective in the classroom, but we need a better way to identify what this is and not label people as “good” or “bad”.

  6. Something we are working on in a few groups (hoping it will catch on in the rest of the district), is objective language and evidence based observations. Based on the medical rounds model of observations, the focus is strictly on facts–what do you see? what was said? what are students doing? what is the teacher doing? etc–This model requires us to do away with any language that may seem judgmental, whether it be positive or negative. And if a “judgement” is made, it has to be backed up with evidence, otherwise it may not be used in the conversation. I’ve practiced it in several instances and it is much more difficult than it would seem. We are judgmental by nature and it is tough not to be. When we base our arguments, comments, and suggestions based on what is actually observed–and the corresponding evidence–it is easier to show places of growth, needs for improvement, and plan ways for all learners (including the teacher) to progress.

    I appreciate this post in particular. I’m dealing with a situation and I don’t want to label someone as a bad teacher, but ineptitudes and and admitted inadequacies and lack of accountability make it difficult to look to any other descriptor.

  7. Thank you for the insights, Steve. It is all too easy to write, “Great essay” or “Good introductory paragraph,” or “Needs more work,” especially when grading papers for over 100 students. I appreciate the reminder to slow down, to enjoy the writing, to let it challenge me, and then to provide a thoughtful response to the student. I agree with you, too, that labeling teachers “good” or “bad” does not help any of us improve our teaching or improve the way that others view teachers. We do need to grow and learn together, modeling that approach and dialogue for our students.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s